The bankruptcy proceedings of Essar steel have an interesting twist. Remember the way it’s gone:
- The Ruias are the promoters of Essar Steel. Essar Steel’s Loans have been unpaid, and they were, since 2013, going through NPA, Restructuring, 5/25 and other such things. They even pretended to get investment from a hedge fund called Fallaron (which later denied that they had agreed to buy)
- Essar Steel owed around Rs. 47,000 cr. to banks.
- In 2017 the RBI said, all such long term NPA accounts should go to bankruptcy court
- The Ruias, surprised that the Indian banking system – or at least, one faction of the RBI – is standing up to them, goes to court to stall the process
- The court says no, let this go on.
- The Ruias try to use a backdoor entry through an entity in which a connected party has a stake – this entity was called Numetal. Numetal bid for the company. But under the IBC law the promoters of a defaulted entity can’t be a bidder.
- Arcelor Mittal too had a bid, and they also had been promoters in two defaulted entities (KSS Petron and Uttam Galva Steels). Mittal then paid the money for those companies and stayed in.
- Numetal had to get rid of Ruia’s link as a shareholder, and they did.
- Eventually Arcelor Mittal won the bid, at about Rs. 42,000 cr. with a further Rs. 8000 cr. injection into the company.
The Ruia’s then put another bid – Rs. 54,389 cr. A promoter can still pay up the loans in full and take the company out of the process. But obviously it is unfair to wait till the time that the last bid is in, and then after the winner is selected, put your bid in.
They haven’t said where they got the money. And why, if they had it, they didn’t put it back before. It’s likely they wanted the banks to agree to a haircut, which is what banks would have agreed to earlier, until the bankruptcy law came along and doused those dreams.
However, courts will have to decide if that bid is legal. As of now, the banking system supports Mittal’s bid. The NCLT (effectively the bankruptcy court) had adjourned hearings twice, until the NCLAT (the appellate tribunal) told them on Jan 3 – get your act together and put an order in.
The case will be decided on Jan 31, 2019. Or so we believe.
But after that:
- A high court
- A supreme court
- A set of appeals.
- A lot of drama.
Which could easily take a year or more! You can’t expect the Ruias, who have been in business for this long, to give up too easily.
The SBI Move: Get Me Out Of Here
SBI, apparently sick of the process, has done something radical. Starting immediately, and ending on 29 Jan, it wants to sell out its holding of the Essar Steel Debt. In an announcement of an auction:
So SBI is selling the portion of debt owed to it, to financial institutions.
They own over 20% of the debt – in fact, they have enough to vote for or against any proposal (because you need about owners of 75% of the debt to approve any deal for bankruptcy resolution)
They will sell at a discount – so:
- the money they are owed is about 15,431 cr.
- out of that they were only going to get 11,313 cr. (since Arcelor Mittal was buying the company at a discount to the debt it owed)
- That 11,313 cr. is something they expect to recover only after a year (courts etc.). So they use an interest rate of 18% to discount the amount by one year, to get 9587.64 cr.
The buyer of this debt will then have to pay Rs. 9587.65 cr. upfront. And if things go okay, the buyer is likely to get the money in a year, in which case they make 18% returns. (This is pretty standard return for a risky asset, so don’t read too much into it).
However, if the buyer gets the money earlier – by some remarkable twist of fate, if the courts fast track this and Mittal pays up within a year – then, SBI says the buyer has to pay an additional amount so that the annualized return is only 18%. (For example if they resolve it in 6 months, then the buyer pays SBI about 792 cr. more)
Why’s SBI selling?
They say, officially, that they don’t want to wait a year. Just get it out of the way already.
It will actually result in a profit – because SBI would have written down 50% of the loan (7715 cr.) and even a discounted sale like this would give them a profit of about Rs. 1,900 cr. more!
That adds to their capital, which means they can lend more.
That’s the official reason. But there is potentially a more sinister reason that this is happening.
The Political Machinations
Here’s a conspiracy theory. It’s totally made up, so don’t assume it’s based on any truth or fact.
The Ruia’s have been close to many political parties. They don’t want to lose the steel asset. They can’t bid and their bid may not be accepted by the court.
But even if the court does allow the Ruias to bid, the current set of banks apparently is so against the Ruias that they are likely to vote a no. In fact, they did, earlier, say that they would rather take a haircut from the Mittal bid (and lose some money) rather than give the Ruias a chance to take this back.
There’s merit in that argument. Mittal’s produced the cash to pay for the asset. The Ruias have not.
Meaning: if they say ok to Ruia, they stand a good chance that Ruia will say he doesn’t have the money, and go right back to the same banks to borrow it – which means they’re back to square one.
How do you solve this? You can’t.
So here’s the conspiracy theory:
- Figure out a way to get a way to ensure that a decision of any sort in the future, by the banks, does not go to Mittal
- For that, you need a 25% stake at least.
- Which is what SBI has, right now.
- So get SBI to dump its debt
- At a discount
- And then, get that debt acquired by a “friendly” party who will then do what you want them to.
We don’t know if this is true, but it could be a mechanism used to complicate the deal going forward. And there are questions.
Why Now? Why Not After 31 March?
The timeline of the deal is like this:
So everything will be done by the 30th of Jan. It’s a little strange to do that when there’s an order coming on the 31st, you would think?
What if Arcelor Mittal Bids?
Well, if the Ruias could try and get control of the SBI’s loan by buying it, why wouldn’t Arcelor Mittal want to buy it too? That way if the resolution happens, they only have to pay themselves. (Or use a financing company in the middle)
If the resolution is scuttled by the court, they can then stop any further attempts to sell to Ruia, because they’ll have the voting rights.
The fight between the two could mean that the bidding sees a price war – and thus, SBI could get more money.
In fact, this could really be the goal – to get them to fight through proxies and get SBI even more money than the reserve price of 9587 cr.
Our View: Benefits SBI, But Hurts the Bankruptcy Process
This sale benefits SBI. They get less than they had anticipated but at least they get it now.
But if it does go through and any party manages to delay the process even longer, then the bankruptcy concept will suffer. It was intended that the company would be revived and fast. But this will hold things for even longer because one party doesn’t want to lose it. The conspiracy theory may not be true, but it does provide leverage for the Ruias or the Mittals to target the entity that buys this debt. If it turns out that a sinister motive was involved, then this becomes the modus-operandi of all the other people who stand to lose their companies to the Bankruptcy courts.
We’ll just have to wait for the court decision, but something tells us the story isn’t anywhere close to over because the fat lady is still putting on her makeup.
