Capitalmind
Capitalmind
Actionable insights on equities, fixed-income, macros and personal finance Start 14-Days Free Trial
Actionable investing insights Get Free Trial
Concepts & Tutorials

Will The Cash Crunch Cause The Indian Economy To Contract?

Cash.jpg

All that anyone seems to be talking about is the demonetization drive. Essentially, this involves invalidating the Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes, and asking people to exchange this with different currency – a new Rs. 2,000 note, or use the old 100s and 50s and so on.
This is intentioned to hurt people that “hoarded” the big notes which presumably is a function of their not having paid tax on it and thus is black money. That view itself makes it immensely popular. But these notes are 86% of the notes printed, and there is VERY little chance that all of it is black – most of it is valid, good money, in my opinion (though data is very scarce here).

The problem with Notes

Can the notes issue contract the Indian GDP? Let me first try and explain.
The simple problem now is: people do not have enough cash to transact. If you want to buy something worth Rs. 300, and you’re not the tiny 1% that buys things using credit/debit cards, then you are in a mess. Do you:

  • Give the new Rs. 2000 note? You need Rs. 1700 as change back. Meaning 17 notes of Rs. 100. Good luck getting that back.
  • Give three Rs. 100 notes? Assuming you have a limited number of Rs. 100 notes, you won’t be able to do this for too many transactions. You stood for hours in a bank queue so you’re not doing that every couple days, dammit.

So you shy away. This doesn’t apply to most of you reading this. You’ll buy on Amazon or Flipkart on your cards, and you’ll use Uber or Ola for your rides. You’ll pay for fuel via cards, your rent via NEFT, your credit card bills online and your EMIs through ECS. This is awesome – and I am a huge fan because I’ve had to use very little real money in the last few days. But this is not the whole country of India.
Think of auto drivers, labourers, vegetable vendors, small kirana retail shops and so on. They earn in cash and spend in cash. They aren’t even in the taxable bracket for the most part, and therefore don’t have “black” money – they just have some savings, and those savings sit with them in cash.
Given that the tax-free income per year is Rs. 250,000 you can assume that many of them will have Rs. 50,000 or more saved as cash. They may have a bank account, but most will find it useless; the basic bank accounts only give you an ATM card for you to draw money out. They will hardly visit outlets where cards are accepted, and even if they do, they find it less intimidating to pay in cash. (If things go wrong with a card, it’s almost a full day gone trying to figure out what happened)
This is the India we don’t talk about at parties. But this is the India that’s struggling today, and smiling while they’re doing it because hey, this black money is coming out and the country will get better. They are okay with it for now, because India is running on fumes. We have the adrenalin, the drive, and the feeling of a greater tomorrow. But like every parent that once held an incredibly amazing new-born baby knows, a few weeks later, the adrenalin is gone, you’re dead tired and cranky.
But yes, you have this problem right now that people aren’t transacting. They’re holding off buying new clothes. For that can wait. They’re saying, yes we need new taps and bedsheets but wait till the cash situation is better. They have money, which is now in their bank account because they had to deposit it. But they have no money because the medium that they use for transactions – cash – is crippled. Even if it’s temporary, they will choose to wait.

The On-Coming Contraction?

And that causes a ripple effect on everything in the economy (well, most things) which runs so much on cash. People buy toothpaste and chips and juices and all that, but now they’ll buy just the essentials – toothpaste. Sales get slower. That’s okay, you think, the sales come back after a while. But the problem lies within.
The FMCG companies that deliver to shops work mostly on restocking. You bought X quantities of chips, it usually goes away in 2 weeks, and you’ll need more. So every 2 weeks, we’ll send you chips. Except now, those 2 weeks are becoming six weeks. “Fast Moving” consumer goods become not-quite-so-fast. Stuff stocks up at warehouses, and factories then cut down production.
This cycle is shorter for perishables. And much much longer for durables. Service businesses like restaurants face it too; less customers who usually pay cash, less purchases from their vendors and so on.
A lower spending cycle results in:

  • Lower business revenue, mostly for discretionary spending – from movies, to small shops, to toys, to even fruits.
  • Lower revenues means job losses – the self employed lose business, the larger shops will fire people.
  • Job losses means a lower ability to pay back loans. For the semi-rich, this is not immediate as they have buffers in savings. For the lower end of the economic strata, savings are low and protected, and loan repayments are difficult.
  • There are ripple effects because news like this will cause even the employed person to clamp down on further spending.
  • All this is because cash isn’t available to spend. Note that some people will move to banking and cards. For the rest, it’s just too abrupt a move.

The issue is: when will cash come back? At the current rate it looks like it will be six months to get the cash printed, and until such time we will have continued restrictions on withdrawals. The restrictions on withdrawals means lower spending, and not enough discretionary spending.

The Consequent Defaults

Already some Microfinance institutions have said that the situation looks bad if the woes continue for longer. Ujjivan’s CEO has said that most repayments are in 500/1000 notes in cash. Most finance companies in the home finance segment are hurting in the “Loan against Property” area.
Defaults are another issue that will crimp business at financial institutions – which means a slowdown in the real economy becomes a slowdown in the financial economy.

Is A Contraction Bad?

Just because there is a lull in economic activity for a few months doesn’t mean it’s the end of the world. Recessions are good because it is a reset and a clean-up, and over time the recovery is strong. It’s better to have a recession than to live in la-la land – where you have a large number of corporate defaulters and banks are refusing to increase lending.
However it does cause short term pain. Our view on demonetization is that it has happened. There is no way to reverse that. And because it has happened, there’s no point commenting if it *should* have happened. Sure, you could do things differently, but so what.
The point is to deal with it. And dealing with it will cause economic hardship, to some of us individually, and to the economy collectively.
We’ll see lower inflation, though at this point, inflation is driven by supply also, and lower supply might be a concern. Trucks aren’t able to carry things over, and if supplies fall short, inflation will spike. Over time, though, we will see a marked drop in prices if there is a contraction.
A contraction or recession are just terms – in reality, we won’t see GDP figures actually go down, since the data collection process won’t show too many chinks in the armour. But the hit to the economy will be visible even if growth slows from 7% to 3%.
There is long term gain in any recession when things are getting cleaned up. There will be some more use of the banking system anyhow, there will be more cards used, and by the building of new businesses because the fat-slob existing businesses die. Look at the wholesale space in toys or consumer goods – it’s dominated by a few people who have cornered the business due to family connections and close-knit community. This business has been hit heavily, and over the next year, it’s quite likely that organized players will break that oligopoly and get us even better prices.

Ways to Mitigate This Risk

As an investor should we be selling everything? No. Stock markets don’t reflect reality. They have been extremely positive through the last few years where earnings made even lower lows. If they can do so well even on lousy news, we can’t assume that the markets will fall hugely just because there is a contraction.
Markets will be very volatile though, because of all the uncertainty around. You can protect your portfolio (our webinar here on how to do it). Or, you can buy more, over time, because hey, your retirement is still far away and such things will come and go. You shouldn’t blindly sell everything – that’s just panic.
And then, remember: this assessment is just one week after the program. A lot more data will come. And you will find that things turn out differently – better or worse. So it’s best to recalibrate based on new information. Keep enough cash to be able to invest, and don’t be in a hurry to deploy it – there will be great opportunities to invest.

  • Shankar says:

    Great article. I have a feeling this story will develop and you may need to update every week. This whole scheme is fraught with unintended consequences, and the people that matter (the ones with the cash hoards and the ones trying to catch them) are not talking much.
    It would definitely have affected the most cash based entities of all – political parties. That may be the reason no party has been able to organize large meetings/strikes yet. They need cash for crowds, and they cannot use what they have, nor collect much now. As some one who spent some time in a small scale industry, I know this for a fact. This will have an effect on the economy.
    I have spoken to several people in TN (rural, urban, old, young, etc), and crisis situation seems to abating. This is because of the large bank/ATM network.
    But not other poorer states. The Government’s rural distribution logistics will get tested to its limits. The sooner they get cash to the hinterland the better for everyone involved.
    This and several other analysis miss the impact of removing the fake currencies circulating in old format. The Government could have at least given a statistical number of that. May be they will later, when things settle down.
    Also, if this move was planned earlier, they would have started printing earlier. With the Government not divulging their logistics, it creates an unnecessary suspense. The six month delay may be calculated with the right formula, but the input values matter.

  • Parakh Nazar says:

    Things may well turn out different if Modi ji puts INR 10k in every zero balance Jan Dhan account (around 7-8 cr of them). Or maybe put INR 3-4k in each of the 25 cr Jan Dhan accounts. All the pain of waiting in lines will be forgiven. Demand will get a big boost. And the government will still end up with a solid net positive amount (assuming INR 2 lac cr of benefit from notes not coming back into the system; out of the total INR 15 lac cr of 500 & 1k notes).
    Not to forget additional money earned by many “Jan Dhan”ers as commission for acting as mules also adds to spending power.
    Let all this spending power be released!

  • Elina John says:

    Indians face cash crunch following the government’s shock withdrawal of 500 and 1,000 rupee notes from circulation. http://www.slideserve.com/ring/india-s-cash-crunch