Actionable insights on equities, fixed-income, macros and personal finance Start 14-Days Free Trial
Actionable investing insights Get Free Trial

We Have To Free The Rupee Because There Is No Other Choice, Says RBI ED

G. Padmanathan, ED at RBI, spoke about the concept of Rupee convertibility recently. He mentioned a lot of things against making the rupee “capital account convertible”. A concept that typically means foreigners can buy Indian assets and Indians can buy foreign assets without any control. He talks about the upsides – that everyone else is doing it, that it facilitates free trade, forces a country to have better economic policies and lower deficits etc.

Capital Mind‘s view on this is clear – we need capital account convertibility now. In fact, we needed it yesterday.

His objections, or what he calls “negatives”, of such convertibility are:

  • opening up the currency doesn’t necessarily mean money flows to increased productivity as it can even be things like lower taxes. (Our view: That’s what you kept taxes low for, in the first place, to attract investment to something specific. This is not an excuse.)
  • There’s no evidence that opening up the currency ensures capital flows into a country or that they help the country at all. (Our view: the problem is this very thinking. Can you tell us why we need a free press? There’s no evidence that a free press helps a country. But the lack of it hurts a country, and that’s what the lack of a free rupee has been doing to us)
  • Free capital accounts are not necessary for growth. (Our view: neither is a democracy. This is clutching at straws.)
  • Capital flows are sensitive to macro developments. (Our view: this works in our favour too, and when it does, it helps everything and everyone a lot more than when it hurts)
  • Capital flows into financial markets can be panicky volatile (Our view: this is true even currently where foreign capital is panicky. It’s not like anything is different. When you have a non-free rupee, you actually stop capital from coming in to balance outflows)
  • Capital freedom will make the exchange rate volatile. (Our view: We believe it will in fact keep volatility under control and concentrated, rather than the current scenario where you just randomly block people from exiting the rupee or introduce silly rules like people can’t buy this or sell that. This just scares away investors.)

But of course, Mr. Padmanabhan probably understands the situation that the old guard might finally have to go. He says, in as much words, that convertibility is inevitable especially as our biggest partners are doing it, and demanding it:

…in fact that greater opening of capital account is inescapable as the Indian economy grows further and becomes global in dimension. A truly globalised economy, which the Indian economy is likely to become in the not too distant a future, cannot afford to remain isolated for a very long period of time. Sooner than later, it will need to get closely integrated with the rest of the world. While there are risks associated with full capital account convertibility, resisting liberalisation over an extended period may prove futile and counterproductive. As the economy gets more globalised, it will become harder to maintain closed capital accounts.

Increasing openness to international trade may create opportunities for circumvention of capital account restrictions through under-and over invoicing of trade transactions and the increasing sophistication of investors and global financial markets makes it much easier to do so. Transfer pricing is one of the methods which corporates may employ to get around capital account restrictions. In any case, keeping any restriction for too long is self defeating as people end up finding new methods of bypassing that restriction. So, India needs to continue moving towards full capital account convertibility. There is simply no escape from it.

It is a moot question as to how fast the movement should be. That will depend on how fast we can meet the most important preconditions like fiscal consolidation, inflation control, low level of NPAs, low and sustainable current account deficit, strengthening of financial markets, prudential supervision of financial institutions, etc. India has already made visible progress on these fronts. There are of course risks, but we need to accept these risks and move forward boldly while controlling the risks as far as practicable.

(Emphasis mine)

While I won’t bother labouring each point again, I welcome the suggestion that we must become fully convertible and that we must allow free capital transactions to happen because there is no alternative. My basic point is: if you don’t do it now, you will be forced to do in the middle of a horrible crisis.

You can put a tiger in a cage and show people how healthy he is, and how your care has ensured he isn’t attacked by other tigers which would have happened in the wild, or that the food you carefully choose for him is the best thing for him, considering empirical evidence from other caged tigers.

But the tiger prefers his freedom, and the world knows now that he doesn’t belong in a cage. I can’t get enough of Tina Turner’s song: We don’t need another hero. We don’t need to know the way home.

  • Vineet says:

    I fully expect the bogeyman of foreigners buying Indian assets to be raised but yes it will happen eventually, all corporates want it and India is slowly getting corporatized.

  • DJ says:

    Ideally, growth should be financed by domestic capital as we have lots of it As a democratic country if our private sector is free, then it shouldn’t matter what foreign capital is doing.
    Its just that the incumbent capitalists (or rather crony capitalists) have bad investments and they along with govt have thought that the idea of finding new FDI/FII bakras would be the way to bail themselves out and continue their crony ways. Chidambaram had this plan in 2012 and he spent almost the entire year doing foreign trips and giving presentations to investors, focusing on FII flows. All of that came to a naught in 2013 with the rates, rupee, debt reversal. Now, Modi and Jet Lee (who is friends with Chidambaram and even less educated in finance, so he will do as he is told by Chidu) are upping the stake by holding foreign visits and looking for investments. While there isn’t much changing on the ground. I would much rather have had them change the rules for domestic capital and investments first rather than first go around looking for foreign capital. This could all still work if they get the domestic scenario improving fast. Otherwise we are just going to get repeated spasms like 2013, only bigger. And, we will continue to have chicken central bank governors who will refrain from free currency.
    In other words, we need to fix some basic issues first before we welcome foreign capital. This talk about foreign capital causing volatility is misleading because its really the bad fundamentals which cause capital to flee (whether domestic or foreign).
    By the way, its kinda funny to hear a RBI bureaucrat talk about productivity. I didn’t know bureaucrats like him cared so much about productivity! How cute.

  • IsItPossible says:

    I would be more interested in the governance to avoid currency manipulation and financial meltdown which affects millions of average citizens than foreigners and corporates.
    Yes, fully convertible currency is needed.
    Yes, if we don’t act then we will be forced.
    Yes, we have a growing economy and talented work force.
    Yes yes yes yes for many more things….
    where is the frame work in regards to policies and enforcement of these policies!!!
    where is the fraud detection, implementation and penalization by law!!!
    will the citizens of India protected against financial crimes/frauds OR just the corporates and BIG shots will get the benefit!!!
    NO one wants to fix the system and do the right thing! Just build future on very volatile and “aisaahi chalta hai” attitude….. really sad state of affairs…. 🙁
    After witnessing US financial meltdown, it appears as if NO country (including India) wants to learn from it and build barriers to avoid such crisis, instead everyone is racing for the next meltdown….

  • Pankaj says:

    While I completely agree that Rupee should be completely convertible; but the arguments you mentioned in point 2 & 3, giving analogies of free press and democracy was rather tangential in nature. Could have done better with economic arguments.

  • izhar says:

    can some one please tell me what this means for the millions of indian expats? which way will the exchange rate move short, middle and long term. Thanks!

    • Doesn’t matter, it will move the way it wants to. Expats should hedge their exposure if they are scared of it, or learn to trade it if they want to time it.
      Predicition is a waste of time here. It’s better to react.