Actionable insights on equities, fixed-income, macros and personal finance Start 14-Days Free Trial
Actionable investing insights Get Free Trial

GDP Growth for FY2014 Revised Up To 4.9%, But It’s No Change At All


MOSPI has come out with two announcements recently. First, they revised earlier year GDP figures.

  • 2011-12 GDP real growth was revised the second time, this time UP to 6.7%
  • 2012-13 GDP real growth was revised down to 4.5% (from 5%)

In the second announcement, the advance estimate for 2013-14 GDP is now at 4.9%, versus 4.5% as predicted earlier.

Wool Over Our Eyes?

The first question I had was: Oh, if they could revise 2012-13 GDP now to a lower figure (a 0.5% drop) then why do we bother about what their “estimates” of GDP are today? They can tell us what they want but eventually they’ll revise it down, won’t they?

Secondly, one of the solid reasons why GDP will grow is that the previous year’s GDP has been revised downwards. The “provisional” estimate of 2012-13 GDP was 55.05 lakh cr. in real terms (that is in 2004-05 rupees), which has been revised down to Rs. 54.5 lakh cr.

The current GDP estimate for 2013-14 takes us to 57.5 lakh cr. which is 4.9% greater than…the now lower number for the previous year!

However, if we assume they did not revise the previous year’s numbers (i.e. left it at 55.05 lakh cr), the latest GDP growth figure would have been 4.45%. 4.45% is exactly around what the GDP growth prediction was before all this drama.

Essentially, all of the “higher” GDP growth number of 4.9% is due to the review of the previous year’s GDP.

In fact last year’s “low” is also because of the upward revision of 2011-12 data to 6.7%. This stuff can eat on itself. It’s no wonder that Indian markets haven’t responded, because there is no real change.

  • sandeep says:

    with so much investigative journalism, 5-6 24 hr business channels, at least 4 national level financial news papers, these people still think they can make fool of every one (or every one is like an Indian Voter who can be fooled every five years)! Revising FY 12-13 downwards substantially 10 months after the fiscal is over then having the balls to give estimate of 13-14……need some level of “chori or seena jori”