- Wealth PMS (50L+)
This is going to be a long post.
Investopresto, a finance portal, shut shop a couple of days back. They follow other illustrious startups to create financial web sites and eventually run out of steam, like paisa.com , moneysights, moneyvidya and many others. This is tragic, and even more to me as I co-founded and shut down Moneyoga three years ago.
Some may say the lack of success is the no product-market-profit fit, and others will say it was the lack of funding. These are strong contenders for reasons, but let’s stop right here and look at the successes.
Other current players:.
There is just one reason. That they don’t make money, period. You need money to run a business (and then, profit). You can get that money by “financing” cash flow – where you raise equity or debt to pay the bills. Or you can survive on “operational” cash flow.
Financing wise, life is tough. We are in a different zone with startups today. Some will never make money but are in so much demand they can raise how much ever they want. Like eCommerce a few years ago, like Payment Gateways in 2013 and like dotcoms in 1999. The financial industry is not a hot one. So it will have to make itself worthwhile by making operational money instead.
Operationally, you have to find revenue. It’s not easy, and the barriers to entry are small. Revenue is anathema for most web startups, and their cost structures are so inflated it’s difficult to make revenue that is enough. Staying small and lean helps, but a hard-nosed focus on revenue is just as important.
You can make money in multiple ways with a financial site.
Most players want to be in the media space. The rest are sparsely populated.
But the big play guys who have gotten trampled are supposed to have:
These are unfortunately, not the pain points India has, that people will pay for, or that advertisers will line up for.
I will live with horrible UX if it solves a real problem. (People using IRCTC, India’s largest ecommerce site, do that regularly) The data from Dion/Tickerplant is often outdated and sadly, wrong. The screeners don’t give you enough to actually make a trade. These don’t solve a serious problem just yet.
Can anyone solve the KYC and document problem? Every darn financial instrument needs a KYC, mostly with the same documents – ID-proof, PAN Card copy, Address Proof and so on. Some need an “in-person verificiation”. Who’s tried to solve this? CAMS/Karvy have a business solution to digitize docs. Yes bank recently allowed you to upload documents to open an account. In person verification is done by users over a video link. These aren’t holistic but are at least attempts to solve a serious problem.
Cutting through the bullshit. Most financial products are badly designed, or missold. You’re never told what you need to know in simple terms. You’re never told that if you don’t bother to understand this product, you should not invest. You’re never told the negatives of the financial product you’re pitched – and there is no easy way for you to find out.
The lack of an integrated trading software. Traders are a big market – not because of numbers, but because they’re at the market every day. Abroad they get great tools to analyse, visualize and trade all at the same time. Yes, give me data, but allow me to trade as well. Current broker web and application interfaces are rudimentary. This segment can only be handled by a brokerage, because of the stranglehold on third party software by the likes of Omnesys and FT.
Mobile Market Data and Analysis are currently in a different era. If you want the “fundamentals” or any advanced charting you have to jump through hoops. Fixed income, currency and options markets are almost absent in whatever few mobile interfaces we have. This is a pain point if you consider how much time people spend travelling and that markets now work for longer hours than ever before.
The pain points are NOT: I want to see great looking UI. Or that I want a faster web site. It’s not the lack of a “financial social network”. These are great ideas but there are bigger problems to solve first. No one I know cares – and while anecdote is not fact, the players who focussed on these elements are getting left behind.
Financial application companies in India need to think smaller. Because the market isn’t that big. Probably a million traders, and probably two million investors or so is the total addressable market size.
It’s fashionable nowadays to think only big. Address the 100 billion dollar market. You have a limited runway and most startups fail, so why not try to hit it big? This is sane advice but if you have a niche that you can address and they want a product, it is still worth your while.
What do you want to make out of it really? Change a few lives, make about 20 crores of your own money? You could do that if you build a company worth 50 crores – and an acquisition of this size is quite achievable. If you can think smaller, it might help; plus, all those big thinking players are running out of market size in the financial space.
But this necessarily means standard angel investors or VCs can’t be bothered. So what? Most niche industry investments happen through industry players anyhow. Most angels and VCs I know will happily admit they don’t know a darn thing about the stock market.
You might say people just aren’t interested in personal finance or stocks.
But people aren’t interested because, like Santosh of Moneysights reminded me of what I told him, people are getting 10%+ increments per year and 40%+ when they change jobs. Who cares about saving and investing when you’re getting that kind of income change? Anyhow – that is just an excuse.
India is a tiny investing demographic. It could change tomorrow, it could take 10 years. You just don’t know. No one was buying online in 2002. Suddenly everyone is today. So the financial web site that succeeds will, like ecommerce, have to stick around.
Real estate is both an investment and a consumption good. If it’s your first house, you spend so much on it and take a large loan on, so you don’t have enough left to really invest. Insurance is usually hard sold as a tax free investment, and so people pile on; and that leaves a bad taste so they get wary of everything else.
Regulation could be a problem or a benefit. Strong regulation is needed; too many people are cheated in this business. Mutual fund commissions have been cut because it’s universally accepted that such commissions shouldn’t be built into the product, they should be charged for separately. The insurance industry sees huge misselling, and with their regulated expenses, rules are framed to ensure that investor money doesn’t “leak” out, say by giving big referral commissions to a bank owned by the same group. Brokerages have crippled the system before, so they’re looked at with an eagle eye. Media plays aren’t deeply regulated yet, but they are getting looked at.
The regulator is not the problem, though people like to blame them. The marketplace thrives even when there is deep regulation (the largest growing sector in India has been banks, and they are the most regulated industry in the country).
The underlying issue is that you have to stick around for a LONG time to make money. Even in the US, Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) turned profitable after 19 years.
Worldwide, financial websites haven’t done all that well. I’ve seen tons of people startup but not make it too big; and the size of even these aren’t much.
One success story was Wallstrip, but it sold at a $5m price tag, which many people think is too small. Clearstation.com was one of the first successes in the space, selling for $35 million in 1999 to eTrade.com. Stockpickr.com by James Altucher was sold to TheStreet for $10 million. The most famous of them – TheStreet.com – listed at a $1 billion valuation in 1999. Now it’s valued at $60 million, 14 years later.
Thinkorswim (a discount broker with a fabulous trading tool) and Wealth-Lab (a system trading software) were acquired by larger players recently. Motley fool (fool.com) is a private company, and supposedly reasonably profitable.
(Of course, mint.com sold at a fantastic $180 million valuation to Intuit)
However most others are either in their early stages, or struggling to find a large exit. The market for traders isn’t that big. Investment gestation periods are long. Transactional plays are expensive.
The struggles are worldwide. Human traders are being replaced by computers and large firms are taking over the action from the small trader outfits. That means it’s not a game of number of investors, it’s a game of the amount of money – and that’s not a game a financial website can play that easily.
I wish I knew. (But I wouldn’t tell you)
Of this post, nearly. But not of the industry. It will come back again, once we’re off the growth path and people will need to learn to invest their money rather than depend on the massive inflation/GDP growth push in the last decade.
I’m in the financial domain, so my interests are vested, but I’d like to say there is a lot more to come.
The lack of success doesn’t mean no one will succeed. It’s not that this company was too early. Or that the market isn’t great. Or that investors won’t put in money. Some of us failed in our execution, that’s all.
Manish Jain (MProfit) has it right:
A startup’s sole purpose is to figure out the market and create a product for it. The question is whether the need for such a tool exists or is it just a mirage?
Soon, one of us will succeed, and that will change the game. Till then, we’ll just have to struggle and fight.
Disclosure: Investopresto and MoneyWorks4Me have advertised on Capital Mind. I’m an advisory board member of Zerodha. Many of the companies mentioned have good friends working with or founding them.