- Wealth PMS (50L+)
Often, to figure out if a country is in a real estate bubble, what is measured is a price-to-income ratio. That is, a house price divided by the income of the buyer.
Typical P-I ratios, in 2007 in the US, went from 9.5 in New York to 6.2 in San Diego (and 0.9 in Detroit). The overall price to income index with a base of 1987, was at 1.6 in 2007 which has fallen to less than 1.1 (according to Calculated Risk). Consider that the base of 1987 means the ratio is a multiple of what it was then. (which I don’t know)
Shanghai, in March 2010, was 27:1.
So price to income ratios can be confusing. Is 6 too high? Is 1 too low? But there is no universal answer. There is also no reason for there to be one universal answer.
1. Consider that houses are financed. Most buyers finance their purchases.
2. Consider that mortgages cost money in terms of interest and principal. This money has to go from a person’s income – and he has to have enough left over to feed his family.
3. The term of these mortgages differs with countries; the US offers 30 year loans, India goes to about 20.
4. The interest rate is the most important factor.
The recent US mortgage crisis has made lenders wary of lending to someone where the monthly payment is more than 38% of the monthly gross income before taxes. In India, lenders stretch up to 40%, I’m told.
Now, let’s consider a person earning Rs. 200,000 per month. This guy’s rich.
Income: 200,000 per month
Taxes: 50,000 per month.
Mortgage potential: 80,000 per month. (at 40% of monthly income).
He’s left with Rs. 70,000 which, because he’s rich and can afford it, spends much of it.
But what kind of house can you get for Rs. 80,000 per month? Assuming rates of 12%, the maximum loan of Rs. 72.65 lakhs. At a 20% downpayment the house can cost Rs. 90.6 lakhs.
This is a price-to-income of 3.77.
If Interest Rates go up to 13%, by the same calculation the highest price one can pay is Rs. 85 lakhs, for a price-to-income of 3.56. The P-I ratio changes based on mortgage rates and terms.
Now consider you’re not that rich. A person earning about 50,000 per month can’t really afford to pay 40% of income, because after that and taxes, what’s left over is too little. With the the P-I ratio will further reduce.
I don’t have a definitive source for Price-To-Income ratios in India but in the outer edge of Gurgaon, they seem to be around 5. A lot of these houses are speculative (i.e. not financed) and run with black money, but at some point, the greater fool will need to have a bank loan. It seems like an enormous bubble to me – especially as similar ratios in countries with much lower mortgage rates resulted in a bust. We’re even more stretched.