- Wealth PMS (50L+)
I attended a couple of interesting meets, consisting of a number of value investors, over at Delhi. They were two separate groups – "Perfect Research" and "InvestmentSuperGrowth" which met, but there seemed to be a significant overlap.
Note: I am a beginner at this "value" investor concept.
Let’s get to the interesting stuff.
First, a presentation by Sanjay Bakshi, a famous value investor and Professor at MDI Gurgaon. He spoke about a few mental habits to get killed in the stock market. He’s a value person so he abhors trading; there was a time when I would find that view silly because it ignores the excellent returns traders have made. But now I think everyone should be allowed their biases, and if hating trading is what makes him a better investor, more power to him.
He mentioned a great example of how our mind plays tricks on us. If you were in a shop for a lamp costing Rs. 10,000 rupees, and the salesperson said, "Listen, we have another store that we’re shutting down, just a mile down the road, and the same lamp’s available at Rs. 9,000". Will you go?
Many of us in the audience, including the stingy me, raised our hand.
Then he asked if we were buying a car for Rs. 10,00,000 (10 lakhs). And the salesperson said you could get the same car at another showroom for Rs. 9,99,000. Will you go?
I sheepishly raised my hand, because when I recently negotiated a deal for a car for someone else, we went through various, perhaps unnecessary hoops to save about Rs. 1,500. But I was the minority – a substantial number of earlier hand-raisers didn’t.
The result was interesting – we wouldn’t do the same amount of work for the exact same amount saved, because Rs. 1000 is a big portion of the Rs. 10,000 lamp, but not much of it for a 10 lakh car. We use mental accounting to screw ourselves out of what we don’t want to be screwed out of.
(Some of you will ask: Why is a value investor buying a bloody lamp for Rs. 10,000? And can I sell him a lot of lamps? Will he buy a bridge? These are very good questions. But you are thinking like a trader. Long term lessons, boys. [and girls] )
The concept causes us to undervalue what we paid lesser for. So if we own two stocks, one of which we paid Rs. 100 for and the other, Rs. 150, and both of them were at 140, we’d choose to sell the first one just because of our mental accounting of a profit. This concurs with my point of forgetting what you bought a stock at – you must imagine that the stock is sold every day and bought back at the same price.
More: We jump to conclusions fast, and overweigh recent data. Crude’s up, we must sell BPCL. Sugar is down so we have to sell sugar stocks. We ignore that these are cyclicals and will go up and down, and when it’s down, it’s probably time to buy. Buy Reliance Power, because Power is a big problem in India. Wait, that was three years ago. Uhem.
Once we come to a conclusion we look for evidence to support it. Edelweiss is going to hold the RPOWER share price boss, I was told in 2008. Obviously this argument was useful for people who had bought Reliance Power at the time.
Next came a presentation on crude, which was interesting in that it said something like every $1 of crude involved a 0.06% increase in our fiscal deficit. That’s not including currency changes or that we could pass on the costs forward.
I’m a little skeptical of seemingly independent factorization of crude prices. At some point everything gets correlated. There is something called accelerated correlation where, in tough circumstances, what is otherwise uncorrelated becomes so and that makes it even more so. Take housing prices, in the US – there is no reason to assume that because house prices in California fall, that housing prices in New York will. But as prices fell faster, they indirectly impacted credit, which created desperate sales everywhere else, and then just the fact that prices everywhere were falling made them fall some more. If crude went up like mad, you can bet that we will change our behaviour and change the concept of oil subsidies dramatically.
Another intelligent value investor came in and said that sitting on cash is important – he sat on cash for a long time, and then when recently an opportunity came, boom, he could take it. Sorta like Warren Buffett could invest in the crisis because he was the only person with some cash.
An argument then ensued with a person who I think was a broker. He said only one thing – Buffett has insurance float, what do I have? Once I’m invested, I have no cash! Even if I sat on cash, and held on, I get a juicy opportunity and I’m back in the market – no more cash. So how does that sit-on-cash concept work for those of us who don’t own an insurance business? He has a point: cash flow is important, and perhaps just as important when you make an investing decision.
Another thing the same guy said was "Teji mein research ki zaroorat nahi hoti, mandi mein kaam nahi aati". (In a bull market there is no need for research, and in a bear market it doesn’t work)
Neeraj Marathe then talked about how analysts get exposed to bias because they made a buy recommendation and now they won’t roll it back even in case of adverse data. Analysts sometimes refuse to even listen to opposite views.
Two ideas that were discussed were:
A BSE-only stock that’s Bangalore based, a foundry/forging unit, where promoters hold nearly 75% and there’s another 12% bought in an open offer under escrow because of SEBI objections. The stock may be delisted and that’s a play, they say. It trades an average of just 300 shares a day at 1334 so be very very very careful.
This is a value investor favourite. There’s a road. Between Noida and Delhi. There is some land around it. The cars on the road pay toll. The company has some 30 years of money-sharing agreement. So you can extrapolate number of cars on the road, ability to increase toll rates, potential land value, revenue sharing with the government and all that, put it in an excel sheet and value the company’s future cash flow.
I personally think there is too much in flux, and all negotiated agreements can be changed, because that’s the way our country is. But the group’s arguments against it went: there is just one road. Alternatives currently exist and can be built. The metro is a pain in the butt for price increases. There is the Mayawati factor. Land banks are a joke. Neeraj pointed out another point that the CEO is paid Rs. 4 cr. apparently for doing nothing (since they don’t have anything beyond that one road) and there is some behind-the-scenes manipulation of the interest rates going on with it’s own parent, IL&FS – debt to the parent went down, and interest paid went up substantially at the same time.
I see a lot of value investing threads about this company. All I can say is that they finally figured out how to sell a bridge to someone.
There was good chai. And some excellent people. And one day I’ll expand on each of the above thoughts. But for now, there are no more paragraphs.