- Wealth PMS (50L+)
I got a mail from Ninad today about how Tata Steels standalone figures had an EPS of Rs. 18, but the consolidated figures including Corus, were released later and found to be Rs. 47 per share.
A little bit of research happened, and I found there’s a huge wool pulling scene happening – very interestingly, all legal, so I have decided to open a thread to solve this puzzle.
At a quarterly consolidated EPS of Rs. 47, up from Rs. 36 last year, this is a damn good buy at Rs. 460, no? Heck, that translates to a P/E of 2! For a company growing at 20%! I’m wetting my trousers at the prospect!
Not really. Turns out the auditors have added a tiny little tidbit to the results:
The consolidated financial results include the consolidated financial results of Tata Steel UK Ltd and its subsidiaries whose income constitutes 74% of the consolidated total income. In UK, the pension liability of Tata Steel UK is computed and accounted for in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards. IFRS permit the impact of changes in the assets and liabilities due to assumptions of variables like bond yield rates, discount rates, inflation and demographic assumptions to be accounted for in “Reserves & Surplus”. This practice is consistently followed by Tata Steel UK. The Indian Accounting Standard (AS15) is different from the above and requires such changes to be accounted for in the profit & loss account.
Given the large share of Tata Steel UK in the consolidated Tata Steel results, and the potential volatility caused by periodic changes in the assumptions underlying the computation of the pension liabilities, it is not considered practicable to adopt a common accounting policy for accounting for the pension liability of the Company and Tata Steel UK Ltd. During the current quarter, the pension funds of Tata Steel UK, with asset base of around £ 14 bn (Rs. 120,000 crores approx), have shown a reduction in the funds’ surplus by around £ 648 million (Rs.5,352 crores). This has been accounted in “Reserves and Surplus” in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS principles and permitted by AS21. This treatment is consistent with the accounting principles followed by Tata Steel UK and earlier by Corus Group plc. under IFRS. Had the company followed the previous practice of recognising changes in actuarial valuations of pension plans of Tata Steel UK, in the profit and loss account, the profit from ordinary activities after exceptional items and before tax for the current quarter would have been lower by Rs. 5,352 crores.
The financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and the pro-forma results for the previous periods have been prepared taking into account the above practice.
Uhem. I don’t like it when companies SUDDENLY change accounting practices, so I decided to venture a little further.
So this pension fund has some gains or losses based on interest rate changes, bond yields etc. This is required by Indian law to be reported in the P&L. Last year Tisco took it all into the P&L – a whopping 5900 crores. That was added to the consolidated PAT, and that figure gives a huge Rs. 162 per share EPS. (which is also weird, I’ll come to that).
So when it added a whopping 5900 cr. it was perfectly fine to take it on their P&L, but when it showed a loss – and that too at 5,500 cr. loss – they refuse to take it on.
So technically, if the laws were followed exactly as they were last year, Tata Steel would report a LOSS for this quarter.
I then said heck, ok, this is still only actuarial gain, but something’s funny in the calculations. So in the annual financials, they have this bit:
They have 73 cr. shares. They have an actuarial gain (let’s ignore the rest) of Rs. 5906 cr. The actuarial gain is non taxable so take the PAT – 12,321 cr. Subtract the 5907 cr. – you will get 6,415 cr.
Let’s assume zero dilution – at 6,415 cr. with 73 cr. shares, the EPS after exceptional items should be at Rs. 87.88. The dilution should take it even lower, one thinks?
So their diluted EPS report is wrong. Ok, big deal. Even in the latest results they restate earlier data without the actuarial gain and show a diluted EPS of 91.44. It takes around 80 cr. shares duly diluted, but that’s a little off.
And they take forex losses as exceptional items (which is weird, because it’s setup to offset current costs, so it’s by no means “exceptional”). Such losses are technically operational – they are hedges. So are gains, btw, so I’m not one sided on this.
Ok now, how much dilution are we likely to see?
That should yield about 14 cr. shares extra. Look at this report from Emkay Research. It assumes an 87 cr. fully diluted equity base – which means I’m close (at least to someone else’s calculations).
At 87 cr. shares the fully diluted EPS should be even lower than at 73 cr. shares, no? So last year’s EPS figure will be about Rs. 73, consolidated.
The first quarter of FY 09 seems to have been good – they earned more than 5000 cr. of profit from operations. But steel prices are off more than 30% since then. And capital has been tight – so surely impact of that on interest paid will be visible. Will profits drop dramatically? Will these actuarial gains be taken back into P&L if they turn positive? Will the FCCBs be converted? Will preference share dilution impact be taken into consideration?
Such complex questions – and no real answers. At one end you may end up with a P/E of 2. At the other, a P/E of 10.
But the stock price at 460 has been seriously weak.
Here’s where I think I must stop believing in reported numbers. I will reject all the bull that that management will throw at me – heck, I could come up with at least three different diluted EPS figures based on my mood at the time. I’ll stop believing in reports – who cares if the numbers themselves may be wrong, and seriously wrong. Perhaps the only thing I can trust is price. If the price is falling, something is wrong, and if it’s rising something is right. Forget why. It doesn’t matter.
No wonder Ed Seykota called them “funny-mentals”. I will now keep posts tagged that way – all these funny weird looking things will be noted as Funnymentals.
Now, Would I short Tisco? Fundamentally I might not – because it looks cheap, etc. But that’s funnymentals. If there ever was a clear downtrend, this is it. In four months it’s fallen from 900 to 460. It’s invitation to short – and perhaps belongs somewhere in the SoS. Have to do some more analysis.
On another note: My April 2007 post on the corus buyout seems to be interesting – I was so wrong and stupid. The price I said would happen in October 2007 – 430 to 440 – is close only in September 2008.