- Wealth PMS
So today was a crazy day. We were long four stocks and short one – Cairn – as our system threw out the trades. Within a few minutes we noticed that there was a strong move up – and after a 2% upmove in an hour, in which Cairn tanked about 3%, we decided to take a “discretionary” call – to exit. After all, the market was up 2.5% – how much more could it go?
As it turns out, a lot more. It ended up 3.57% up.
But that was not the worst of it. If we had not used discretion, we’d have been up 5%. Lesson learnt: don’t override the system.
We generally never do – in fact if either of us think of it, the other person stops him. And earlier there are instances when our discretion has proved to be beneficial. But net-net it seems to do nothing – and the discretion adds emotional baggage we don’t particularly want. The best, therefore, is for computers to take over and do the trading – no discretion, no emotion, just a P&L at the end of the day.
Fully Automated Trading – the only reason I want to stay FAT.
On another front, my Nifty straddle went nuts. From a net price of Rs. 126 yesterday it was up to Rs. 170 today – a Rs. 44 profit, which is 30% plus. Of course I can’t claim it’s a single day, and since I wouldn’t put all my capital on it it wouldn’t even be 30% of total capital. But say I were to allocate some 1/5th of capital it would return about 6%. That’s not bad at all, even if this were the only deal to happen the whole month.
Having said that, I went long another strangle near the money – the idea being that such moves will result in either an extension of the move, or a retracement, again helping a long strangle. If I were to suggest a new position – as of end of day today – it would be a 4700 call and a 4300 put – for a net cost of Rs. 120. A profit target of 20% would apply – and then yet another strangle. My preliminary back tests show that this is only successful when the index has been range bound for a while – but when it does set up, it’s largely successful.
Note: to program this into a trading system is trivial, so it’s not quite discretionary. But I haven’t quite done the full array of tests I would usually do with a system, so I consider it a discretionary trade.